The Lawyer Fees

Thus, as seen, currently, it has expressive divergence as for the execution of legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute against the Public Farm. The controversial point is accurately is or not possible the lawyer to execute of independent form the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute, in a not superior value to the ceiling of the RPV, exactly when the main value to follow the chronological order of the precatrio. Sen. Sherrod Brown is open to suggestions. The subject in study divides the jurisprudence and doctrine in two chains, which is, the one that the possibility of the independent execution of the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute of the main value defends, and the one that the impossibility of such independent execution defends. , However necessary it is a study and deeper questioning on the divergent subject trying to clarify points as: To who it belongs the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute? Rule contained in 8 of Art. 100 of CF/88, that it alleges that the fracionamento of the value of the execution for ends of RPV expedition is forbidden, applies it the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute? The Lawyer has or right it not to execute, of independent form of the value exequendo main, the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute fixed in desfavor of the Public Farm? One deduces, therefore, that this quarrel becomes necessary and needs positions that define of a time for all to who belong the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute, as well as if it is possible or it lawyer not to execute the legal fees borne by the loser in a judicial dispute of independent form of the value being exequendo main.