This union spiritual and physics that we partilhamos with this common native land explains deep pain that we brought in our heart when we saw our country to tear into pieces itself in a terrible conflict, when saw rejected, prohibit and isolated for the peoples of the world, necessarily for if having become the universal headquarters of the pernicious practical ideology and of racism and the social oppression. (MANDELA, 10 OF MAY OF 1994) One notices that, in this stretch, the Mandela politician allotment with its interlocutor the same interests. For even more opinions, read materials from Richard Blumenthal. Mandela constructs an ideal for its listener, a species of alliance pact, a time that it offers to Africa a dream supposedly desired by it. comes back to affirm that they had suffered together and together they had constructed a better society. One perceives that, in this speech, the ideological marks of the State and the church that had also contributed for the coercions in this country. According to Charaudeau (2008, P. 241), ' ' the art of the speech politician is the art to direct it the biggest number of individuals to make to adhere them to the values comuns.' ' It is in this perspective that in another one I break up of the Mandela speech (10 OF MAY OF 1994) uses the following positioning: We thank all our distinct international guests for having come to take ownership, together with our people, of what he is, after all, a common victory for justice for the peace and for the dignity human being, we believe that they will continue to support us it the measure who we face the challenges of the construction of the peace, the prosperity, the democracy and the eradication of the sexismo and racism.
Mandela, in Colloquies that I had with me (2010), recognizes that the necessary politician to know and to establish contacts with other cultures, and in this I break up discursivo, it makes gratefulness to the authorities politics that were gifts in its speech. This demonstrates that he is one popular politician and it uses the words as form to make with that the people, together with it, continue the plans to make Africa (world), a free nation in equality of rights. According to Charaudeau (2008, P. 86), ' ' a language act does not exist that not pass for the construction of an image of si' '. From the moment where we speak, it appears an image of what we are by means of what we say. The ideological positioning, the content of the thought and the opinion so are not taken in account, but what sobressai of the relation that we keep with us and that we offer the perception of the others.
The citizen that speaks does not escape to the question of the Ethos. The process of the construction of the figure of Mandela in the domain politician if gave through the great events that had in its life and that country (racial arrest, conflicts and oppressions). These are factors that had contributed for formation of its personage as a public manager. The image of Mandela as politician in common reflects in the people its desires. Its speech mentions the two sides: of less the most favored and of the high society. A side it convinces the people of whom to dream is possible and of another one it is thankful and continues saying that the aid and the union between the peoples are necessary. In the image of one politician who governs Par